Pricing and quotation guide
Amazon PPC negative keyword cost
Negative keyword work is mostly review time. Its cost depends on how many campaigns and search terms need checking, how much history is reviewed, how long since negatives were last looked at, whether proposals go through approval rounds, how often reviews are repeated and whether old negative lists also need cleaning up. It may be bundled into PPC management rather than sold alone. Because good negatives reduce wasted ad spend for as long as campaigns run, the work can pay for itself, but only if it is careful enough not to block searches that sell.
This guide sets out the cost drivers, audit and ongoing options, pricing approaches and how to judge value. No prices are given, because they depend on the account and the provider; LetGetGrow sets out the cost for your project in a custom quotation.
Illustrative diagram
What drives negative keyword cost
- Search term volume
- More searches mean more review time.
- History
- Reviewing months of data takes longer than weeks.
- Account structure
- Many campaigns and ad groups need careful levels.
- Approval rounds
- Proposals and revisions add time.
- Frequency
- Regular reviews are a recurring cost.
Costs paid to third parties (separate from our fees)
- Ad spend while data is gathered
- Reporting tools
- Your own review time
Ask whether clean-up of existing negatives is included or quoted separately.
Options compared
| Option | Typical scope | Relative cost |
|---|---|---|
| One-off audit, small account | A few campaigns, recent history | Lower |
| One-off audit, neglected account | Many campaigns, long history, old lists | Moderate to higher |
| Ongoing reviews | Regular search term review | Recurring |
How the work is priced
Audit fee
Suits you when
- Accumulated waste to clear
Watch out for
- Follow-up included
Within PPC management
Suits you when
- Ongoing management
Watch out for
- Review frequency
Hourly
Suits you when
- Small or irregular reviews
Watch out for
- Time estimates
Why neglected accounts cost more
An account that has run broad and automatic campaigns for a long time with few negatives has a lot of search history to review. The first audit takes longer, but afterwards regular reviews deal with smaller batches of new searches. Expect the first piece of work to cost more than routine upkeep.
Paying for care, not volume
Adding hundreds of negatives quickly is easy; checking each against converting searches takes time. A quote based on the number of negatives added rewards the wrong thing. Prefer pricing based on time or scope, with the over-blocking checks described.
Example: audit then routine
Illustrative example — not a client case study
Situation: A homeware seller has not reviewed search terms for most of a year.
- A one-off audit reviews the full period and clears the worst waste.
- Monthly reviews follow, covering only new search terms since the last review.
- The seller compares irrelevant spend in search term reports before the audit and after the first two monthly reviews.
What this shows: The larger first cost was followed by smaller routine costs. This example is illustrative.
Comparing quotes
Check how much history is reviewed, whether proposals need approval, how over-blocking is checked, whether old negatives are cleaned up, what log is provided, whether a follow-up check is included and how often ongoing reviews happen.
Keeping costs down
Supply a clear note of what the product is not, flag searches you already know are problems, export reports yourself and agree a spend threshold for judging searches. Reviewing regularly keeps each batch small.
Judging value
Compare the share of spend on clearly irrelevant searches before and after the work, and check that sales from converting themes held steady. If spend fell but so did sales, a negative may be too broad.
Your own time
Approving proposals and answering questions about borderline searches takes some of your time too. It is worth it for the first audit; for routine reviews, agree which kinds of negative can be added without asking.
What a quote should state
A clear quote names the period of search term history to be reviewed, the campaigns in scope, whether negative product targeting is covered, how many rounds of proposal and revision are included, the format of the change log and whether a follow-up check after a few weeks is part of the fee. Without these, two quotes that look similar may describe very different amounts of work.
When it is bundled into management
If negative keyword work is part of a monthly PPC fee, ask how often search term reports are reviewed and whether the review is a full pass or only the highest-spend searches. A bundled fee is convenient, but it can hide how much attention exclusions actually receive. Asking to see the change log each month shows whether the work is being done.
Weighing cost against spend
There is no general figure for how much negative keyword work saves, because it depends on how much irrelevant traffic the account attracts. The useful comparison is your own: what share of spend went to clearly irrelevant searches before the work, and what share afterwards.
Questions about Amazon PPC negative keyword cost
What affects negative keyword cost?
Search term volume, history, structure, approvals and frequency.
Why does the first audit cost more?
It reviews accumulated history; later reviews are smaller.
Is it part of PPC management?
It can be; check how frequently reviews happen.
Should pricing be per negative?
Time or scope is better; per-negative pricing rewards volume.
How can we reduce cost?
Share what the product is not and review regularly.
How do we know the negative keyword work paid off?
Less irrelevant spend with sales held steady.
Request a Custom Quote
Ask about Amazon PPC negative keyword cost
Thank you — your enquiry has been sent.
We have received your message and will reply by email. If you need to add anything, email info@letgetgrow.com.